![Oxford Reader's Companion to Conrad](images/conrad_roi_des_belges.jpg) |
By Jeremy Hawthorn, Norwegian University
of Technology, Trondheim
Terry Collits, Postcolonial
Conrad: Paradoxes of Empire. Routledge Research in Postcolonial
Literatures Series. London: Routledge, 2005. xiii + 226 pp. £55
According to the blurb on its dust-jacket,
Terry Collits's study "tackles what is now a central question in
both postcolonial studies and Conrad scholarship: what happens when
Conrad's novels are read from the perspective of the colonized?"
The book is divided into two parts. The first, "Locations," considers
Conrad's fiction in the context of, in order, the history of ideas,
literary history, England, Marxism, and the postcolonial world.
The second part, "The Great Novels of Imperialism," devotes separate
chapters to " Heart of Darkness," Lord
Jim, and Nostromo,
and two chapters to Victory.
Leaving aside the fact that "Heart of Darkness"
is not a novel, this seems straightforward enough and yet on reading
this book I repeatedly had the feeling that its focus sometimes
disconcertingly shifted. Take the following comments:
-
"This book
will address the hermeneutic problem framed by these two statements
[from Brecht and Zizek]: from our perspective in the present,
what is the best way of relating to writings from the past?"
(1)
-
[The book's]
"more modest aim is to survey the shifting contexts in which
Conrad has been read for more than a century." (2) "The present
study therefore will not only re-read Conrad's colonial novels
("themselves") but also map and analyse the interpretative tradition
they have generated." (2)
-
"Rather
than attempting a comprehensive and chronological survey of
Conrad's reputation in the twentieth century, I intend to examine
four distinct moments in the reception of his fiction which
are arguably four different aspects of the Conradian moment,
more widely understood."
-
[These moments
are (1) the originary moment, when the works were first published;
(2) Conrad's canonization by F. R. Leavis; (3) the "effect of
the cultural turmoil of the 'Sixties,' which was characterized
by wars of National Liberation, revolutionary hope (sexual in
the West, political/cultural in the East), and a French-inspired
epistemology known as critical theory"; and finally (4) "the
shadowy and reflective present moment"] (3)
-
"My chief
object in this book is to reconsider Conrad's meditations on
European imperialism in a handful of remarkable novels set in
non-European parts of the world, and to do so with reference
to significant moments in the discussion they have provided
during the past hundred years." (17-18)
-
"The principal
concern of this study is to answer the question of how - given
the complexity of the issues it examines - we may read and understand
Conrad nowadays." (19)
These statements are not exactly contradictory,
but they do slide around. Are the interpretive contexts studied
generated by the fictions themselves, or are they the product of
non-literary factors such as "wars of National Liberation"? How
do the "four moments" correlate with the five chapters in the book's
first part? And what does it mean to have a "chief object" that
seems rather different from the book's "principal concern"?
A tendency to avoid the straightforward in
presenting arguments can sometimes be frustrating. Collits's discussion
of Nostromo, for example,
opens with a comment on the novel from Leavis, then moves to Lukács's
discussion of the similarities and differences between Homer's epics,
Greek and Shakespearean tragedy, and the novels of Tolstoy. Then
we are back to the issue of historical versus non-historical readings
of classic texts, with a brief mention of Foucault and a full page
on Samuel Johnson's discussion of King
Lear. Collits then quotes from Roland Barthes's discussion
of sexual allure in The Pleasure
of the Text ("Is not the most erotic portion of the body
where the garment gapes?"), and we are back to Nostromo
and the torture of Hirsch with a paragraph that opens "As with the
erotic, so with cruel violence." The use of seven-league boots in
critical discussion can be exhilarating, but here and elsewhere
the leaps are random, unpredictable, and unenlightening.
In my view, this book is better in local details
than in cumulative force. Some of the particular discussions are
certainly rewarding. Collits's account of the very important role
played by F. R. Leavis in establishing Conrad's canonical status
in the 1940s makes an important contribution to our understanding
of the development of Conrad's reputation and readership in the
second half of the twentieth century.
Collits agrees with Geoffrey Galt Harpham that
Leavis's The Great Tradition
(1948) was the single most influential text in the history of Conrad
criticism, but he points out that Leavis's reading of Conrad "minimized
consideration of those themes that are currently regarded as the
principal source of his power and appeal: namely, the politics of
imperialism and the ideological uses of racial difference" (51).
Collits's account is useful as a way of understanding Leavis's low
opinion of " Heart of Darkness," although it in its turn surely
proposes too narrow a conception of the "principal source" of Conrad's
"power." Were we to accept Collits's view of the principal source
of Conrad's power and appeal we would be hard put to find any of
it in The Secret Agent - certainly
one of the major works in Conrad's canon.
Also useful is Collits's suggestion that when
Leavis stresses the way in which The
Shadow-Line depicts "solidarity of community or the bond
of work under the sign of an august tradition" (62), but leaves
out the narrator-captain's experience of isolation. This can be
related to Leavis's own celebration of a relationship to Cambridge
that celebrates the communal but passes over the isolation. The
book also usefully discusses the way in which Leavis and Georg Lukács,
despite their wholly different ideological commitments, agree in
privileging realism over Modernism. (Collits fails, however, to
note that this is true only with regard to fiction. When it came
to poetry, Leavis was a thoroughgoing supporter of Modernist innovation.)
Other points of detail are valuable. Collits
offers a thought-provoking discussion of parallels between Brierly
and Jim in Lord Jim, and he
argues that when the Marlow of " Heart of Darkness" talks about
Towson's book with its talk of "chains and purchases," these terms
punningly call to mind details of the slave trade that some of the
"honest" sailors who first read Towson's book must have contributed
to. I do not recall having seen this important insight pointed out
before.
This is, however, a book that claims to situate
Conrad in a postcolonial context. Collits's definitions of colonialism
and imperialism do not appear to take in Russian imperialism or
Poland's experience of it. Under
Western Eyes is not a text to which Collits devotes special
attention. It is, too, only in his two-chapter discussion of Victory
that he really justifies the claim made in his book's blurb to read
Conrad's fiction from the perspective of the colonized, and here
his concentration on the figure of Wang is both rewarding and problematic.
Collits argues of Wang that "Having disarmed
the white man and thrown in his lot with the Alfuro villagers, he
now serves the diagnostic purpose of showing that Heyst's dreamy
existence on Samburan is based on deeply racist assumptions," and
that "he himself (and not Mr Jones) is the true challenger to Heyst's
Adamic mission" (172). But the colonized in this novel are these
same villagers, not Wang, and Conrad hardly gives the reader much
of a basis to see things from their perspective, or, indeed, from
Wang's after he abandons Heyst and Lena.
Collits does engage with some perennial questions
relating to Conrad's depiction of colonialism and imperialism. He
claims that "Like the rest of Conrad, 'Heart of Darkness' was read
for almost forty years in ways that masked its political content
as a critique of imperialism" (54), and, referencing Hunt Hawkins's
1979 study, suggests that it was only "Politicizing readers of 'Heart
of Darkness' in the 1960s and 1970s" who "asked whether its negative
critique of imperialism was directed specifically at Belgium (for
perversely distorting in the Congo an otherwise worthy ideal) or
included Britain as well" (127).
This omits mention of those (particularly early)
readings that did see the novella as a critique of imperialism and
also those more recent attempts carefully to historicize Conrad's
view of colonialism and imperialism. A postcolonialist study of
Conrad should certainly consider, for example, Stephen Donovan's
1999 article in The Conradian,
"'Figures, Facts, Theories': Conrad and Chartered Company Imperialism"
(24.2).
As its dust-jacket blurb also claims, this
is a "wide-ranging volume." There are some sharp insights and points
of detail to reward the student of Conrad in its pages, but its
meandering progression makes it at times frustrating reading.
© 2006 Jeremy Hawthorn
|